Why marijuana should be outlawed according to Feds

Brewing Master » Brewing Liquor » Why marijuana should be outlawed according to Feds

Categories: Brewing Liquor

Question:

"There are 100,000 total Moslems in the U.S., and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic rituals result from this religion. This religion can cause white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others… The primary reason to outlaw Islam is its effect on the degenerate races." — "La Cucaracha, la Cucaracha, Ya no puede caminar, Porque no tiene, porque le falta, Marijuana que fumar."

Response:

"There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the U.S., and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana can cause white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others… The primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races." —Excerpt from the testimony of Harry J. Anslinger, director at the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, before the U.S. Senate in 1937. Yeah, I remember watching "Reefer Madness" as the preview to midnight movies, like the original "Heavy Metal".

Same here. I’ve read several links that suggest some of the main lobbyists against marijuana are the cotton industry, the liquor industry, as well as the tobacco industry. It’s not so much that reefer is supposedly a dangerous drug as it is that it would take away money from other industries if it were legalized. I see it no different than alcohol or tobacco or even coffee. Just another substance to catch a buzz off of if you like that kind of thing. The suggestion about it promoting satanism or degenerating races is pure garbage. I wonder if our government has a problem with people growing their own coffee or tobacco for personal use. Are they subject to some kind of regulation here in the US? I admit ignorance here since I haven’t done any research into this question yet. — Elroy Willis EAP Chief Editor and Newshound http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – "There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the U.S., and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana can cause white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others… The primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races." —Excerpt from the testimony of Harry J. Anslinger, director at the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, before the U.S. Senate in 1937. Yeah, I remember watching "Reefer Madness" as the preview to midnight movies, like the original "Heavy Metal". Same here. I’ve read several links that suggest some of the main lobbyists against marijuana are the cotton industry, the liquor industry, as well as the tobacco industry. It’s not so much that reefer is supposedly a dangerous drug as it is that it would take away money from other industries if it were legalized. I see it no different than alcohol or tobacco or even coffee. Just another substance to catch a buzz off of if you like that kind of thing. The suggestion about it promoting satanism or degenerating races is pure garbage. I wonder if our government has a problem with people growing their own coffee or tobacco for personal use. Are they subject to some kind of regulation here in the US? I admit ignorance here since I haven’t done any research into this question yet.

As far as I know coffee is no problem. I think that tobacky requires a license however. We can brew some (200 a year, IIRC) gallons of beer and can ferment some amount of wine. I don’t think we’re allowed to distill any liquor, however, without Unc’s okey dokey. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – — Elroy Willis EAP Chief Editor and Newshound http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – "There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the U.S., and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana can cause white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others… The primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races." —Excerpt from the testimony of Harry J. Anslinger, director at the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, before the U.S. Senate in 1937. Yeah, I remember watching "Reefer Madness" as the preview to midnight movies, like the original "Heavy Metal".

I’ve got the big three 30’s "marihuana warning" movies on video…. "Reefer Madness", "Assassin of Youth" and "Marihuana: Weed With It’s Roots In Hell!". – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – — Fester The Not-So-Bad-Assed Atheist #369 Chief Cook and Dog Walker, EAC Mixed Metaphor Division Ordained Clergyman, The Church of Spiritual Humanism With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. Steven Weinberg, quoted in The New York Times, April 20, 1999 — Insane nut rant at http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice "Commodore Rimjob" is available at http://crimjob.tripod.com Why did the Scientologist cross the road? – mimus To slug Bob Minton. – Shydavid (See http://www.BobMinton.ORG/ "You can lie about ICR all you want." — "Jason Daniel Henderson" Avoir sexe avec L. Ron Hubbard’s crane et le nain il troupeau en sur.

Response:

What I always found rather interesting was how no one mentioned that marijuana and hemp were the same thing, it was easy to scare folks with this "new" dangerous drug from Mexico, it would have been much harder to convince anyone that Grandma’s ‘rumatize medicine, Granddad’s evening smoke or the source of some folks oil for oil lamps were going to send you to hell with a bloody ax in your hands. — Harry F. Leopold Prints of Darkness aa #2076

Response:

snip I suggest you read up on Prohibition, alcohol did not escape legal constraint, or have you forgotten about Al Capon, bathtub-gin, speakeasies and Elliot Ness and the Untouchables? You might also read up on the 19th Amendment and why it is the only amendment removing another amendment. — Harry F. Leopold Prints of Darkness aa #2076

Response:

With the religious fanatics back in power, you should get a lot of juicy quotes on that too… –Francois Tremblay www.insolitology.com

Response:

in article "There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the U.S., and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana can cause white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others… The primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races." —Excerpt from the testimony of Harry J. Anslinger, director at the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, before the U.S. Senate in 1937. What a crock!

Yup, but it is exactly what Anslinger had to say. — Harry F. Leopold Prints of Darkness aa #2076

Response:

posted in alt.atheism: Same here. I’ve read several links that suggest some of the main lobbyists against marijuana are the cotton industry, the liquor industry, as well as the tobacco industry. It’s not so much that reefer is supposedly a dangerous drug as it is that it would take away money from other industries if it were legalized. Cotton? Does one ingest it, inject it or smoke it? (I assume that wearing it is okay.)

Since acient times hemp has been harvested for fibers to use in rope, cloth, paper, etc. It is an alternative to cotton: http://www.cannabis.com/faqs/hemp1.shtml The hemp plant is a variety of cannabis. The plant used for industrial purposes contains very little THC, and wouldn’t be of much value to would want to smoke it. Nevertheless, the cotton industry, fearing competition, and the other groups mentioned used that excuse to have hemp production virtually banned in this country. I wonder if our government has a problem with people growing their own coffee or tobacco for personal use. I don’t know about tobacco (it /is/ taxed) but growing your own coffee? Not where you live and not where I live. Brewing newspaper would taste better. Not to mention the acreage you’d need to ensure a year’s supply.

– John Hachmann, aa #1782 It was the schoolboy who said: "Faith is believing what you know ain’t so." – Mark Twain (1835-1910).

Response:

Cotton? Does one ingest it, inject it or smoke it? (I assume that wearing it is okay.) I think that they were afraid that "chanvre" (I don’t know the English word) would be used to make clothing and other uses of tissue.

Jute? — Elroy Willis EAP Chief Editor and Newshound http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – posted in alt.atheism: Same here. I’ve read several links that suggest some of the main lobbyists against marijuana are the cotton industry, the liquor industry, as well as the tobacco industry. It’s not so much that reefer is supposedly a dangerous drug as it is that it would take away money from other industries if it were legalized. Cotton? Does one ingest it, inject it or smoke it? (I assume that wearing it is okay.) I think that they were afraid that "chanvre" (I don’t know the English word) would be used to make clothing and other uses of tissue. I wonder if our government has a problem with people growing their own coffee or tobacco for personal use. I don’t know about tobacco (it /is/ taxed) but growing your own coffee? Not where you live and not where I live. Brewing newspaper would taste better. Not to mention the acreage you’d need to ensure a year’s supply.

Don’t know about that.. But Im [starting to bald] – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – — Olrik aa #1981 Qualified SMASH member EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

Response:

I think that they were afraid that "chanvre" (I don’t know the English word) would be used to make clothing and other uses of tissue. I wonder if our government has a problem with people growing their own coffee or tobacco for personal use. I don’t know about tobacco (it /is/ taxed) but growing your own coffee? Not where you live and not where I live. Brewing newspaper would taste better. Not to mention the acreage you’d need to ensure a year’s supply.

– Olrik aa #1981 Qualified SMASH member EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

Response:

Hemp fiber can be used to make clothes so it would be in competition with cotton. It’s not really the same type of marijuana that people smoke, but that doesn’t seem to make a difference for those who want to keep farmers from growing hemp. http://www.sodakhemp.org/bhpioneer121900.htm "Are the police in Canada and 32 other nations so much better than South Dakota law enforcement, that they can avoid confusion, while our cops can’t? Or is it that our politicians have been bought off by the lobbyists for big oil, big cotton, big paper, big lumber and big medicine — all of whom face serious competition when our farmers are allowed to grow this versatile crop, hemp." http://www.bake-n-shake.com/advocacy-real%20story.html "The illegality of hemp and pot had nothing to do with saving our moral standards from decay. Hemp was the largest single crop in the world, prior to its prohibition. By removing it from the marketplace it upset a balance, that allowed the victors of the Marijuana Tax Act to prosper beyond their wildest dreams.. We would still be a land of plenty had hemp not been taken off the market. The production of hemp is the only realistic option that can stop the need to rape the remaining borial forests. Furthermore it is not a compromise: hemp fiber makes better paper & lumber products that are cheaper to produce & of superior quality. Hemp bio-mass gives the plastics industry a better lower cost raw material, and the fiber would seriously improve the performance of most plastics in many applications. The harvesting of hemp would totally eliminate our dependency on foreign oil, which is a serious threat to national security, and create a cheaper cleaner fuel than gasoline." I wonder if our government has a problem with people growing their own coffee or tobacco for personal use. I don’t know about tobacco (it /is/ taxed) but growing your own coffee? Not where you live and not where I live. Brewing newspaper would taste better. Not to mention the acreage you’d need to ensure a year’s supply.

I realize I couldn’t grow it here, I was just wondering if there were any regulations involved. As for tobacco, I was wondering if I’d have to pay some sort of tax if I only grew it for personal use and wasn’t intending to sell it to anybody. — Elroy Willis EAP Chief Editor and Newshound http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news

Response:

alt.atheism: As far as I know coffee is no problem. I think that tobacky requires a license however. We can brew some (200 a year, IIRC) gallons of beer

100 gallons and a second 100 gallons if there’s a second adult in the household. (No credit for further adults.) and can ferment some amount of wine.

I forget how much. 100 gallons? I don’t think we’re allowed to distill any liquor, however, without Unc’s okey dokey.

And you won’t get it. — Al – rukbat at optonline dot net Zymurgist # 2

Response:

posted in alt.atheism: I’m a criminal and I didn’t even know it. I made a still in college out of an electric teapot and some copper tubing. It didn’t work very well, but I guess it was illegal?

And more complicated than it had to be. Ice distilling is much easier for small quantities. — Al – rukbat at optonline dot net Zymurgist # 2

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I wonder if our government has a problem with people growing their own coffee or tobacco for personal use. Are they subject to some kind of regulation here in the US? I admit ignorance here since I haven’t done any research into this question yet. As far as I know coffee is no problem. I think that tobacky requires a license however. We can brew some (200 a year, IIRC) gallons of beer and can ferment some amount of wine. I don’t think we’re allowed to distill any liquor, however, without Unc’s okey dokey. Stills of any sort (used to ?) require a license. Technically if you used the bottom of your wok and some ice to make brandy the wok would have to be licensed. I’m a criminal and I didn’t even know it. I made a still in college out of an electric teapot and some copper tubing. It didn’t work very well, but I guess it was illegal?

Unless they have relaxed the laws, yes. Turn yourself in, you’ll feel better. It’s easy to make a still, it’s hard to make a good one. Get me a copper kettle, get me a copper coil, Fill it with cornmeal and whiskey mash, and no more I will toil.

Response:

Cotton? Does one ingest it, inject it or smoke it? (I assume that wearing it is okay.) I wonder if our government has a problem with people growing their own coffee or tobacco for personal use.

I don’t know about tobacco (it /is/ taxed) but growing your own coffee? Not where you live and not where I live. Brewing newspaper would taste better. Not to mention the acreage you’d need to ensure a year’s supply. — Al – rukbat at optonline dot net Zymurgist # 2

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The suggestion about it promoting satanism or degenerating races is pure garbage. I wonder if our government has a problem with people growing their own coffee or tobacco for personal use. Are they subject to some kind of regulation here in the US? I admit ignorance here since I haven’t done any research into this question yet. As far as I know coffee is no problem. I think that tobacky requires a license however. We can brew some (200 a year, IIRC) gallons of beer and can ferment some amount of wine. I don’t think we’re allowed to distill any liquor, however, without Unc’s okey dokey.

Stills of any sort (used to ?) require a license. Technically if you used the bottom of your wok and some ice to make brandy the wok would have to be licensed.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I wonder if our government has a problem with people growing their own coffee or tobacco for personal use. Are they subject to some kind of regulation here in the US? I admit ignorance here since I haven’t done any research into this question yet. As far as I know coffee is no problem. I think that tobacky requires a license however. We can brew some (200 a year, IIRC) gallons of beer and can ferment some amount of wine. I don’t think we’re allowed to distill any liquor, however, without Unc’s okey dokey. Stills of any sort (used to ?) require a license. Technically if you used the bottom of your wok and some ice to make brandy the wok would have to be licensed.

I’m a criminal and I didn’t even know it. I made a still in college out of an electric teapot and some copper tubing. It didn’t work very well, but I guess it was illegal? — Thamus http://www.thamus.org/News/ Random headline: Ten Commandments "Just A Math Error", Says God http://www.thamus.org/News/interviews/command_math.html

Response:

frighteningly enough this is the real reason that Marijuana is illegal in this country and probably the strongest argument for decriminilization around. The Narcatics laws and the controlled substance’s act are in fact racist legislation based not on any sort of science in their creation but instead to control and punish minority groups who used the substances as recreational substitutes for alchohol. Marijuana was in fact attacked because it was extremely popular with Migrant Hispanic workers. Cocain orignially because it was the drug of choice of blacks. Alchohol and Nicotine have avoided legal constraint mainly because they are drugs popular and accepted by white society. Further evidence of the racial bias of drug laws can be shown in the make up of our prison population. Even though the majority of drug users are white the majority of people in prison for drug convictions are people of color. The sad thing is the fact that the racial basis of the war on drugs (which is tantamount to a war on the citizens of this country) is completely ignored in the emotional indignation over the mater. The so called "War on Drugs" is the greatest travesty in the history of this country. Its a war that makes criminals out of victims and hypocricy a national policy. It is an further example of the flawed thinking of supply side conservatives. It attempts to address the supply side of the equation while marginalizing the demand side. Even Richard Nixon recognized the flaw in the policy of interdiction. Even then people knew that money spent on treatment of drug addiction got better results than money spent on interdiction. So the question that is begged must be this. With all of the evidence that the policy of interdiction has been a complete and utter failure (adjusted for inflation drugs cost less today than 10 years ago) meaning that just based on the economics of it that plenty is getting through our wonderful interdiction to keep the prices low. Why do we continue this failed policy? Think on this if you want to know how far to trust someone or what their true motives are look to where they have a financial or power gain. The people who are profiting from the war on drugs are simply foriegn drug lords and darker elements in our own government. Consider this where did Olie North, and company get the money to buy the arms that they traded to Iran? "There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the U.S., and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana can cause white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others… The primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races." —Excerpt from the testimony of Harry J. Anslinger, director at the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, before the U.S. Senate in 1937. — Insane nut rant at http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice "Commodore Rimjob" is available at http://crimjob.tripod.com Why did the Scientologist cross the road? – mimus To slug Bob Minton. – Shydavid (See http://www.BobMinton.ORG/ "You can lie about ICR all you want." — "Jason Daniel Henderson"

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Avoir sexe avec L. Ron Hubbard’s crane et le nain il troupeau en sur.

Response:

"There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the U.S., and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana can cause white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others… The primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races." —Excerpt from the testimony of Harry J. Anslinger, director at the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, before the U.S. Senate in 1937. It’s funny how the arguments change to reflect the current boogeyman.

The latest example of this is the rapid motion of the RAVE Act through Congress. Youth, the once and forever pariah of the government. http://ncadi.samhsa.gov/newsroom/rep/195.htm http://www.health.org/newsroom/rep/195.htm — *GlennGlenn – Lost & seeing double somewhere in Hollywood, CA — aa#825* The Earth is degenerating today. Bribery and corruption abound. Children no longer obey their parents, every man wants to write a book, and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching.

Brewing Master